This is one of the great works of traditional astrology. No cookie cutter
light reading here; Firmicus Maternus is far out.
Though his theory of astrology in eight books is the longest work of Greek
astrology that survives (written in Greek, that is; Maternus was Sicilian), it
has not gotten nearly as much press as Ptolemy's Tetrabiblos or even other works
by practicing Greek astrologers like Valens & Dorotheus. Part of this has to do
with translation - Jean Rhys Bram was a classicist, not an astrologer, so she
didn't really understand the material. With a new edition due (someday) from
Project Hindsight, hopefully in coming years more people will discover the
treasures of Firmicus Maternus.
Foremost among the many jewels of the Matheseos is the emphasis on the two
techniques of antiscia and duodecima. Since Firmicus was so emphatic about these
two methods, when first reading this book a few years ago I decided to check
them out. Lo and behold, chart after chart, I have found them to be every bit as
important and revealing as Firmicus claimed. I now view the regular positions of
the chart itself as only part of the story. Antiscia and duodecima are another
part, and the Greek lots (also called Arabic parts) are yet another part. To all
you modern astrologers who may be reading this, forget about sorting through the
baffling array of midpoints - just check the antiscia and the duads and
everything will become clear.
It continues to be my view that both of these techniques could reinvigorate
astrology. If this has piqued your curiosity, I gave a talk last fall entitled
Antiscia and Duodecima, Two Amazing Greek Techniques Revived. It is available
from Sun Recordings and Steve Pincus at 650-9686-4513. Cost is $20 plus tax and
shipping.
Back to Firmicus. I rather like a guy who tired of the 'dog-eat-dog'
confrontations of the law business to practice astrology, but I'll be the first
to admit this work isn't for everyone. Even for a seasoned astrologer like me it
is challenging reading. As is often the case with older authors, he'll say
something is true without explaining why - yet we are used to getting the why
first, then the examples as backup. The other price of entry is your ability to
drop concerns about having a bad death. Apparently life in 4th century Italy was
pretty rough, because Firmicus elucidates this topic at length. Yet if you can
get over the 'but what about my chart syndrome' and concentrate on why one
example is a challenging chart and why another one a good chart, there is
much to learn.
A difference from contemporary astrology is *how much* things
differed when the chart is day (Sun above horizon) or night (below horizon).
This essential distinction underlies the entire work and informs virtually all
his comments on the effects of planets
Another interesting section describes the effects of the Moon's movement (from
one planet to another) on the life. He also distinguishes between left and right
aspects, something that astute observation has proven true in my own practice. Maternus also has his own method of
determining the chart ruler, and while it sounds fishy everything else he does
seems to work, so I'll say it warrants investigation.
From the work of Firmicus, it is safe to say that what we think is astrology is
only a small fraction of used to be astrology. I greatly look forward to the
works from
Project Hindsight which is making the historical effort to translate the key
works of Greek astrology. Having astrologers translate instead of university
scholars who don't know their way around a chart will make a tremendous
difference in accuracy and usability of the material. But their edition of
Maternus will be a while, so in the meantime if you want some idea of the real
stuff then check out
this
version.